Fabio, thanks for your quick reaction.
I agree, the added latency added by the ASCOM driver doesn't sound like a lot and is not bad, BUT if the native driver downloads up to 6fps full frame in 1x1, it is still more than an order of magnitude slower.
Yes, the QHY268C and the corresponding ASI ZWO 2600MCPro are APS-C OSC cameras with 26.8MPixel, the corresponding full-size cameras have 60 MPixels (!).
I appreciate very much that you are going to add it to your developments. Thanks a lot for considering it, Fabio!
I will also post any answers from QHY regarding the topic (nothing yet as of today).
Sorry for the wrong testing, my fault. I have looked at single images as well. Here is a screen dump of 2 single frames (ASCOM left, native right) acquired with Sharpcap and analyzed in AA7.
Also, the statistics have not changed significantly ( I am sending you a private link to the original data as well for your analysis, if i have missed something). Here are the statistics of the 5th file each:
. Min Max Background Avg Sum Std. Dev rel. Std. Dev.
native driver: 8613 31448 20926 21610 5,64E+11 6227 28,8%
QHY-ASCOM driver 10554 38064 24906 25976 6,78E+11 7468 28,7%
PS: I fully agree with you, those speeds have been completely unheard of just 5 years ago, but they are also setting new standards and expectations and opening completely new possibilities.